The Fourth Amendment applies to a search only if a person has a “legitimate expectation of privacy” in the place or thing searched. If not, the Fourth Amendment offers no protection because there are, by definition, no privacy issues.
Courts use a two-part test (fashioned by the U.S. Supreme Court) to determine whether, at the time of the search, a defendant had a legitimate expectation of privacy in the place or things searched:
For example, a person who uses a public restroom expects not to be spied upon (the person has an expectation of privacy) and most people — including judges and juries — would consider that expectation to be reasonable (there is an objective expectation of privacy as well). Therefore, the installation of a hidden video camera by the police in a public restroom will be considered a “search” and would be subject to the Fourth Amendment’s requirement of reasonableness.
In the aftermath of a divorce, the relationship of minor children and their grandparents can often be the source of sign... Read More
In the aftermath of virtually every car accident, there’s a critical question: who caused the crash? Who will be legal... Read More
After an accident, memories can fade, witnesses may relocate or even die, and crucial evidence can disappear or become d... Read More
How It Works